Benchmark between ext4 file systems, ext3, reiser and xfs.
Meeting interesting entry we can see on the Phoronix website regarding the performance of what will be the replacement for ext3, as btrfs does not leave the ext4 compared to other heavyweights such as XFS, Ext3 and ReiserFS. As always have used the phoronix-test-suite this time in version 1.6 alpha2.
Happy reading.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_benchmarks&num=1
Related posts:
- Problems with the ext4 file system problems with the ext4 filesystem ...
- Ubuntu 9.04 will use ext4 at installation. Ubuntu no longer news, this time we revel ...
- Summary of characteristics of hand, IBM ext4 That the ext4 filesystem promises, it is no ...
- Benchmarks between Ubuntu and Mac OS X in the Phoronix website we can find a comparison of ...
- Redhat and AMD migrate virtualized systems to manage computers with different CPU VMware few months ago said it would be impossible, but ...
Comments
3 Comments on Benchmark from ext4 filesystems, ext3, reiser and xfs.
-
xender on Sun, 7th December 2008 11:49
-
jkarretero on Tue, 2nd Nov 2010 17:49
-
unlisto on Tue, 2nd Nov 2010 23:01
I would say ... she should have something to compare.
I wish I knew how it behaves according ext4 files are great for small.
Well, everyone knows that so far was the best xfs with large files, small reiserfs, jfs the least annoying to the CPU and ext3 was good at everything and none perfect.
The interesting thing for me is to know where ext4, to place it in the appropriate partition.
The data presented, assuming them true, only relate to speed. However, other aspects are also important.
How to recover a system crash?
What is the average amount of data lost due to a failure and asynchronous write?
How to behave when it exceeds 85% of capacity?
I can not agree more with both and also the hue of jkarretero seems very appropriate.
What do you think of Benchmark across filesystems ext4, ext3, reiser and xfs.
?
...
Tira Ecol
Translator
