Small differences (between ZFS and Btrfs)

June 17, 2010 by Macbeth
Filed under: BSD , Linux , Solaris
Warning: file_get_contents () [ function.file-get-contents ]: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 404 Unknown virtual host in / var / www / vhosts / tod-os.es / httpdocs / wp-content / plugins / wikiovote.php on line 40

Warning: [ function.file-get-contents ]: failed to open stream: Success in / var / www / vhosts / tod-os.es / httpdocs / wp-content / plugins / wikiovote.php on line 40

ZFS: designed by Sun Microsystems in 2004 for Solaris and FreeBSD, it is porting Linux natively, also includes Mac OS X 10.5 Server. Supports drives and files of 16 exabytes (16 million terabytes) not reaching the Zettabyte, where its name comes, supports checksum ECC, supports POSIX, supports snapshots and integration with LVM, supports encryption, the highest number of files is February 48, repair itself mirrored disk is RAID 5 and RAID 6, no data is overwritten or references from or metadata, within the units ZFS file systems are created with ease to create directories on NTFS or EXT3. Any application without any problem associated with this filesystem, then indicated disc 1 and 2 TB. Video of their characteristics ( in English ) and documents organized in addition to this PDF . It works fine with the compression algorithm LZJB .
zfs

Btrfs: designed by Oracle in 2007 for Linux, supports drives and files of 16 exabytes (16 million terabytes), supports checksum ECC, supports POSIX, supports snapshots of snapshots and integration with LVM, does not support encryption, the highest number of files is 2 64. Some other features unmentionable and repositories of source code.

Share

Related posts:

  1. Benchmarks between Ubuntu and Mac OS X in the Phoronix website we can find a comparison of ...
  2. The ubiquitous among us JJ Ubuntu 9.04 (alpha5) have been issued the penultimate alpha of Ubuntu (La. ..
  3. Benchmark between ext4 file systems, ext3, reiser and xfs. find interesting entry we can see on the web ...
  4. Between Wolfram Alpha and the Semantic Web W3C Consortium has set the global new step in ...
  5. According to the Steam platform, Windows 7 is going barbarian among gamers [caption id = "attachment_1869" align = "alignleft" width = "171" caption = "The data provided by Steam us ...

Tags: , ,

Comments

6 Comments on From small differences (between ZFS and Btrfs)

  1. Macbeth on Thu, 17th June 2010 0:25

    2. The problems occurred at Ramses may have a partial solution looking and reading this website

  2. Macbeth on Thu, 17th Jun 2010 19:13

    3. I just received the openSUSE 11.3 RC1 with support for the Btrfs file system.

  3. Rarok on Fri, 18th Jun 2010 11:49

    4. That what is being ported to Mac ... in 10.5 Server was supported and suddenly without saying anything they eliminated the 10.6, so I rather doubt that Apple is interested in ZFS, probably will be preparing their own.

  4. ventejuy on Fri, 18th Jun 2010 15:25

    5. And Oracle is in charge of the two. I wonder who has not tried to link the two developments.

    Regarding Mac The truth is there was much talk that zfs replace hfs +, but decided to stop it. Zfs really was not intended for the desktop, but hfs + would have been rather an update.

  5. Macbeth on Sat, 19th Jun 2010 16:55

    6. Discard not know what ZFS on OS X Server 10.6. Thanks for the comment update to reality.

  6. __TXC__ on Thu, 15th July 2010 6:14

    7. FreeBSD UFS2 supports 1 Yottabyte http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yottabyte lot more capacity than zfs, btrfs, ntfs, ext4 and other filesystems including journal with gjournal and other features ... http://en.wikipedia.org / wiki / Comparison_of_file_systems

What do you think of small differences (between ZFS and Btrfs)? ...






Close
Mail