Miguel de Icaza better hybrid

November 17, 2009 by Macbeth
Filed under: Linux , Software , Windows
voted
0

Do not we need Mono? Do not need either GNOME Shell in September 2010? Betting on the open source IDE.NET IDE.NET Microsoft and Novell are integrated as never before was he right Stallman and anticipating this whole code and close the builder to sell a Linux applications from Visual Studio 2010? C # should we relegate to a comfortable fifth plane and invest more in the traditional C + + or interpreted and increasingly in vogue Python 3?

Mono Tools for Visual Studio 1.0 is a plug-in that allows a tool to produce binary exclusive-open libraries, this interoperability between one world and the other (also reconciles with the Mac OSX) is a symbiosis of probation which saves in portability for now only to SuSE RPM package. Special mention Icaza understood as "Linux market" Linux operating environment and although no one can deny that Tux would not be an exceptional merchandise in Tirania.blog the fish mouth also die. MonoVS is available for evaluation by 30 and it is unknown whether the Russians will try to crack it as they did in win32.

Mono is a continuation of the adaptation. NET by other means. Mono means One with Windows and the universe, the unification of the overall monocódigo by Novell. Mono writes the future of Linux is the future of Windows.

Share

Related posts:

  1. Best Documentary on FOSS little more to say about this documentary about free software ...
  2. New Visual Studio, Windows 8 [caption id = "attachment_2766" align = "alignright" width = "150" caption = "Visual Studio"] [/ caption] The users around ...
  3. About C # and Microsoft Visual Basic development teams of C # and Visual Basic are ...
  4. The development of the unpredictable: Mono 2.8 dotGNU never took off and the bytecode. NET is open ...
  5. Mono 2.4 is throwing themselves and contains more functionality The. NET incorporates universal in its most complete ASP.NET ...

Tags: ,

Comments

2 Comments on Miguel de Icaza better hybrid

  1. Deabru on Tue, 17th Nov 2009 20:01

    2. You've been at home, right? xD

  2. Supercriticon on Tue, 17th Nov 2009 23:03

    3. To my knowledge the Mono download the kit does not come hallucinogens. Watch where I'll answer as I am doing on all pages that address this issue. (There goes the copy)

    Years I've been in this for Linux, maybe too much. But perhaps not enough to understand San Miguel de Icaza and his unique vision.

    I'm going to release Michael. We go to the Microsoft case. I built a clone of Java (and for that I think is a Java last but another day, not today), I put money into the project a lot. Purpose have language, framework, platform, what you will, that allows me to run a "pseudo binary" on different platforms and this in theory.

    Comes the step of creating the virtual machine. For Mac and Linux, not flipeis!, That they will not do. Best!, I throw the hook. Miguel comes to their children, pica and enlisted in this monkey. If it is a wonder, if that ... etc. And I do the dirty work. Next Step, Microsoft evolves linking the non-Windows platform written to entangle the ability to clone everything you can and more.

    This is pure marketing (or marketing) and Microsoft never gonna let Mono reach. Net Mono will always be second fiddle sounding stale. If Mono is version 2 as they 3 and any other solution. Come on, type Xbox 360 for Xbox 2 will not call. Always slipstream and not just in the advertising but in the characteristics. With this race can not be a lot of money and of course the customer, who seeks to operate. Net, which means that work best and that it has earned Microsoft you are "creators" of this from. Net Mono and second fiddle.

    Make no mistake this is not say that there is great cross-platform applications made for .Net / Mono, which is very good. But back to sell me that Mono is the future, even in dreams. What is the strategy? ¿3 Monkey Gnome put up in the soup? I do not understand, enlighten me with your wisdom Miguel.

    On the one hand that Microsoft will not sue us for using Mono, do I have to endure life pardon me, to give them, but given good. What we have contributed to the Gnome desktop we were wrong?, What in reality we have to do now in Mono?. And while you laugh it's because Microsoft (competing in the race costs money), we come now with crap like the iPhone or the monkey Tools such. And of course who does not think like you are a fan of GNU / Linux, I'll leave the business in Novell tray to you my hours and leaving many people contributing.

    Well you're wrong but do not know how full and how funny and I have saved some IRC chats about your opinion of KDE a few years old. I think that now, as of today, Mono is very committed legally, both Microsoft and Novell for you, unlike Gtk and KDE (Nokia / Qt).

    Miquelon, Miquelon, it seems that would be wrong for the Gnome desktop diva claims that are not getting bent, that the project is not profitable to you imaginabais, which tightened Novell shareholders. For ale is more your Mono Mono fanaticism with which you have exceeded that of Richard as the criticism.

    PS: If Gnome 3 Mono necessarily used in its operation, the dream of Microsoft and so that is a bad copy of your desktop, it will be time to think about where I leave my time to contribute and change the good thing about Linux is that there are options and many.

What do you think of Miguel de Icaza at best hybrid? ...






Close
Mail